凤凰彩票交流群 - 凤凰彩票软件

来源：凤凰彩票注册2021-02-15 17:48

山西多举措做好春节期间农民工返乡返岗保障工作******

　　中新网太原1月12日电 (杨静)记者12日从山西省人社厅获悉，该厅联合山西省民政厅、山西省交通厅、山西省总工会下发《关于进一步做好春节期间农民工返乡返岗保障工作的通知》(以下简称《通知》)，多举措为农民工提供服务，让农民工安心过年，助力企业复工复产。

　　对春节期间留岗留工人员，用人单位要严格执行法定节假日、休息日加班工资规定，按职工本人工资标准的300%、200%支付工资报酬，各级劳动保障监察机构对拒不支付的要依法查处。对外卖、快递、网约车等平台企业从业人员劳动权益要及时保障，确保新就业形态劳动者工资报酬春节前兑付到位。

　　对春节期间发生工伤的，各级人社部门要建立“快理快赔快付”应急响应机制，对参加工伤保险的要及时按规定支付相关待遇，对未参加工伤保险的要督促用工单位尽快赔付等。

　　各户外劳动者爱心驿站要为有需要的农民工提供“累能歇脚、渴能喝水、饭能加热、伤可用药”等暖心服务；支持企业在春节期间对留岗职工开展职业技能培训，人社部门根据参加培训人数，按每人300元的标准给予企业职业技能培训补贴。

　　在服务保障方面，确保农民工返乡返岗有序畅通。对有集中返乡返岗需求的农民工提供“点对点”服务。乡镇(街道)就业服务站要公布联系方式，组织专人对有需求的农民工及时提供帮助。省外务工人员服务工作站要为有需求的晋籍务工人员提供返乡服务和困难帮扶。

　　同时，要拓宽帮扶渠道，确保农民工就业服务应享尽享。各级公共就业服务机构要提供线上线下专场招聘服务，开展家政进社区等活动，为有就业意愿的农民工至少提供一次职业介绍服务。

　　各级零工市场要及时发布各类零工信息，对寻求零工的困难农民工提供帮扶，协调解决食宿等基本生活困难；鼓励各级劳务品牌、省校合作基地等积极承担社会责任，发挥示范带头作用，对有需求的农民工提供岗位推荐、组织输出等服务，协助做好农民工返乡返岗服务保障工作等。

　　在欠薪治理方面，确保农民工及时足额拿到工资。对发现农民工工资未按时足额支付以及农民工投诉举报的欠薪线索，要当日启动调查、三日内解决，支付确有困难的要及时动用工资保证金或应急周转金先行垫付。

　　同时，对未按期解决的严肃实施约谈问责，对欠薪企业从严从重处罚。春节前实行每日调度报告，确保欠薪问题动态清零。

　　此外，《通知》要求，各级人社部门要积极协调财政、银行等部门，确保全省企业职工和城乡居民养老保险待遇在1月16日前全部足额发放到位，工伤保险、失业保险待遇在春节前发放到位。(完)

凤凰彩票交流群

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.